Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 78 KY 224 - Clore v. Lambert

Clore v. Lambert’s Empirical Analysis

1879

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
4
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently February 2018

11 state decisions

30187918801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““What evidence is there then that Clore and Clay intended to make this machinery a permanent accession to the realty? The burden was upon appellee to show that his lien reached this property, and in this we think he has failed. ’ ’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.