Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 78 MASSAPPCT 749 - Kane v. Vanzura

Kane v. Vanzura’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Opinion of the Justices to the House of Representatives · Boston Waterfront Development Corp. v. Commonwealth · Mt. Holyoke Realty Corp. v. Holyoke Realty Corp. · Sheftel v. Lebel · Tucker v. Poch

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “use of a way for access preceding severance of the dominant parcel from the servient way will support the creation of an easement by implication,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Downer, and those claiming through his estate, would have used Melville Walk for access to the beach,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the beach and shore of Hingham harbor opposite the end of Melville Walk and Lot 1 on [the 1897 Plan]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.