78 Md. App. 522 - Reed v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
October 1999
most recently cited
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Moore v. Arizona · State v. Hicks · Montgomery County v. Woodward & Lothrop, Inc. · State v. Frazier
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1. Did the trial court err in denying Ingram’s motion to dismiss the charges against him on the ground that he was denied his statutory right to a speedy trial? 2. Did the trial court err in denying Ingram’s motion to dismiss the charges against him on the ground that he was denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial? 3. Did the trial court err in waiting 13 months after Ingram's conviction before ruling on the motion to dismiss? 4. Did the trial court err in refusing to recuse itself? 5. Did the trial court err in refusing to strike its previously made finding of fact? 6. Did the trial court err in refusing to issue a subpoena duces tecum for Judge Joseph H.H. Kaplan and Judge Edward Angeletti? 7. Did the trial court err in refusing to allow counsel to question Judge Angeletti about the conversation he had with Judge Gordy after receiving the first subpoena? 8. Did the trial court err in restricting Ingram’s ability to cross-examine Judge Angeletti by directing that the letter of July 2, 1987, be marked as an exhibit for identification and then shown to Judge Angeletti? 9. Did the trial court err in refusing to allow the defendant to call Andrea Smith as a witness, after it became apparent that she was present during Judge Angeletti's reported conversation with Judge Gordy on October 30, 1985?”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ingram v. State“assessed in light of the interests of defendants which the speedy trial right was designed to protect.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A county administrative judge or a designee of that judge”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ingram v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.