Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 78 Misc. 2d 112 - Frances B. v. Mark B.

78 Misc. 2d 112 - Frances B. v. Mark B.’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
4
states following
July 2004
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Foman v. Davis · Williams v. Democratic Party · Baker v. Nelson · Mirizio v. Mirizio · Jones v. Hallahan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Assuming, as urged, that defendant was a male entrapped in the body of a female, the record does not show that the entrapped male successfully escaped to enable defendant to perform male functions in a marriage. Attempted sex reassignment by mastectomy, hysterectomy, and androgenous hormonal therapy, has not achieved that result.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.