Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 78 MO 100 - Morehouse v. Ware

Morehouse v. Ware’s Empirical Analysis

1883

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
January 1966
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently January 1966

1 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

30188318901900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Scott v. Crews · Picot v. Bates · State ex rel. Midgett v. Matson · State ex rel. Ingram v. Morton · State ex rel. Kelley v. Thornton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We agree that ‘The filing of an account cannot, of itself, constitute a settlement. A settlement is the act and judgment of the court, of which there must be some record.’ Morehouse v. Ware, 78 Mo. 100 , 103. * * *»”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.