Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

78 Mo. 583

Watson v. Crandall

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1883

Supreme Court of Missouri · decided 1883-10-15

<p>Liability for false Representations. A is res^qa^il^.^cgj.^^-conp sequences of false representations made by him to B. andjipori which C acted to his loss, where it appears tha?^ínñen&e(f that they should be communicated to C, and acted upoijniy ninrih the manner which occasioned the loss.*</p>

Relies on Watson v. Crandall

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · Decided 1883-10-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 1983

3 state decisions

1018831890190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Ray, J.

¶1This cause was commenced in the St. Louis circuit court, where there was a dismissal as to defendant Minshall, and a judgment for the plaintiff against the other defendants, from which Conlogue and. McKeen appealed to the St. Louis court of appeals, where the judgment of the circuit court was affirmed, from which the said Conlogue and McKeen have appealed to this court. The case is reported in 7 Mo. App. 233, where the opinion of that court is set out in full, and to which reference is here had. TTpon a careful consideration and review of that opinion we are satisfied with the result reached by that, court, and for the reasons assigned. After a careful examination,-also, of the elaborate briefs of counsel, in this court, we find no cause to change our views. We think the case well considered and properly decided.

¶2For these reasons the judgment of the St. Louis court of appeals is affirmed.

All concur.
/78/mo/583 · .json · Public domain