Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 78 NC 564 - State v. . Laxton

State v. . Laxton’s Empirical Analysis

1878

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
4
states following
September 2010
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently September 2010

11 state decisions

40187818801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. . Jones

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is quite obvious from the words of the act that its special object was to prevent the intimation of such opinion in connection with and constituting a part of the instructions by which the jury were to be governed, and when its influence on their minds would be direct and effective.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “In the conduct of jury trials, much must necessarily be left to the judgment and good sense of the judge who presides over them....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.