Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 78 ND 360 - State v. Simpson

State v. Simpson’s Empirical Analysis

1951

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
October 1992
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 1992

3 state decisions

2019511960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"`An injunctional order in an equity case, pendente lite, issued by a court having full equity powers and complete jurisdiction of the subject matter, must be obeyed while it remains in force, however irregularly or erroneously it may have issued.'" See also Hodous v. Hodous, 76 N.D. 392 , 36 N.W.2d 554 , 12 A.L.R.2d 1051 ; Glein v. Miller, 45 N.D. 1 , 176 N.W. 113 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The defendant is given the right to move for the vacation of an injunction at any time, but until he does so, and the court finally grants his application the injunction prevails and a violation thereof would constitute contempt of court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.