Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 78 N.J. 454 - State v. Atkins

State v. Atkins’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
December 2014
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently December 2014

22 state decisions

8019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Wilbely · Hammock Ex Rel. Hammock v. Hoffmann-LaRoche, Inc. · State v. La Porte · Rodriguez v. New York · State v. Stefanelli

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “evidence of prior crimes may have some bearing on motive, intent, plan, absence of mistake ..., Evid.R. 55, does not automatically warrant its admission.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “If the defense in the instant case had been alibi or a general denial, these prior convictions might properly have been excluded even though they were relevant to intent.... While intent would still be a necessary element of the prosecutor's case, the question of motive or intent would not have been raised by the evidence and thus the probative value of the prior offenses would likely be outweighed by their prejudicial effect. [ Id. at 462 .]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “buttress the affirmative defense of reasonable mistake.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.