State v. Franklin’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
275 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 280 later decisions — most recently March 2021 · most notably State v. Boyer (1985), State v. Ortega (1991)
275 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Anders v. California · Griffin v. California · Malloy v. Hogan · MacHibroda v. United States · Hurtado v. People of the State of California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 280 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We think it appropriate to call attention to the fact that the Supreme Court of the United States in Machibroda v. United States, 368 U.S. 487 , 82 S.Ct. 510 , 7 L.Ed.2d 473 , discussed the proper procedure for district courts under the provisions of 28 U.S.C.A., § 2255 , from which our Rule 93 was patterned. That court pointed out that the federal statute requires a district court to ‘grant a prompt hearing’ when such a motion is filed, and to ‘determine the issues and make findings of fact and conclusions of law with respect thereto’ unless ‘the motion and the files and records of the case conclusively show that the prisoner is entitled to no relief.’ The court there went on to emphasise that where factual allegations relating primarily to purported occurrences outside of the courtroom put in issue matters upon which the record could cast no real light, the court must hold a hearing at which the prisoner is permited to offer evidence(Emphasis supplied.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Reece“appointed counsel should set forth contentions urged by a petitioner whether or not counsel feels they have merit and whether such contentions are in fact argued by counsel”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Blea
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.