State v. Sanchez’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 4 district · 26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently April 2020 · most notably State v. Laguna (1999), State v. Walsh (1969)
2 federal appellate · 4 district · 26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Montsdoca v. State · Gonzales v. Shoprite Foods, Inc. · State v. Hinojos · 23 Ill. 2d 295 - The PEOPLE v. Williams · State v. Parsons
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““* * * the theft of anything of value from the person of another or from the immediate control of another, by use or threatened use of force or violence.” (Emphasis added.)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Walsh · State v. Baca““ * * * robbery may be committed (1) by use of force or violence or (2) by threatened use of force or violence. As explained in 2 Wharton’s Criminal Law and Procedure, § 554: “ ‘It is essential that the defendant accomplish the taking of the property by means of force or violence or by intimidating or putting the victim in fear.’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Segura“The situation here is comparable to those pickpocket or purse snatching cases, where even though there was some touching or jostling involved as the property was taken, the crime was larceny because of the absence of force or fear.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.