Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 78 N.M. 647 - Webb v. Hamilton

Webb v. Hamilton’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
September 1995
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently September 1995 · most notably American Tank & Steel Corp. v. Thompson (1977), Candelaria v. General Electric Co. (1986)

25 state decisions

1001968197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Montoya v. McManus · Bradbury & Stamm Construction Co. v. Bureau of Revenue · State v. Prince · State v. Chavez · 39 Cal. 2d 83 - Subsequent Injuries Fund v. Industrial Accident Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “in § 59-10-18.4(A), supra, means the disability defined in §§ 59-10-12.18 and 59-10-12.19, N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl.Vol. 9, pt. 1, Supp. 1971) then a workman could suffer the loss of a finger or toe, not be disabled under either §§ 59-10-12.18 or 59-10-12.19, supra, and thus entitled to no compensation benefits for the loss. The internal wording of § 59-10-18.4, supra, suggests to us that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The language of [Section 52-l-43(D)] * * * simply means that where the loss of sight in one eye results in total disability because the sight had previously been lost in the other eye, the limitation provided in the schedule (120 weeks) for the loss of one eye shall apply.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “* * * that the scheduled injury section is exclusive unless there is evidence of separate and distinct impairment to other parts of the body in addition to the disability resulting from the injury to a scheduled member. * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.