Peyton v. Nord’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 2 district · 83 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 94 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2013 · most notably McKeiver v. Pennsylvania (1971), 359 So. 2d 586 - State in Interest of Dino (1978)
4 federal appellate · 2 district · 83 state decisions — followed in 17 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gideon v. Wainwright · Gault · Kent v. United States · Betts v. Brady · Norton v. Shelby County
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 94 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““AA'e would add that if the reasoning ol' In lie Gault, supra, is applied in this ease it would be difficult in our view, to escape the conclusion that the jury trial guarantees of Art. II, § 14, N. M. Const, as well as those of the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution are likewise applicable.” Peyton v. Nord, 78 N. M. 717, 437 P. 2d 716 (1968).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““The right to trial by jury as it has heretofore existed shall be secured to all and remain inviolate.” (Emphasis added)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Doe · State v. RUDY B.“We conclude that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment requires that in respect of proceedings to determine delinquency which may result in commitment to an institution in which the juvenile's freedom is curtailed, the child and his parents must be notified of the child's right to be represented by counsel retained by them, or if they are unable to afford counsel, that counsel will be appointed to represent the child.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.