Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 78 N.M. 770 - Tijerina v. Baker

Tijerina v. Baker’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
6
states following
November 2014
most recently cited

43 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently November 2014 · most notably State v. Coffin (1999), State v. Pierce (1990)

43 state decisions

150196819701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Konigsberg · United States v. Bentvena · 126 W. Va. 568 - Nelson v. Nash · In Re Thomas · Blea v. Cox

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We are concerned with the procedure by which the bonds were revoked and these petitioners confined in the penitentiary. The record is clear that the order of revocation and the issuance of a warrant for their arrest were made ex parte, and without notice to or an opportunity to the petitioners to be heard. “The Constitution gives to one accused of crime the right of personal liberty pending trial, except under certain circumstances. We have found no decisions in this or any other jurisdiction concerning the procedure for revocation of a bond. As long ago as Ex parte Lucero, 23 N.M. 433 , 168 P. 713 , L.R.A.1918C, 549, this court said that a suspended sentence gives a defendant his right of personal liberty and that due process requires a notice and hearing before such suspension can be revoked. See also Blea v. Cox, 75 N.M. 265 , 403 P.2d 701 ; State v. Peoples, 69 N.M. 106 , 364 P.2d 359 . Upon this principle, it would seem that due process would also require notice and an opportunity to be heard before bond can be revoked and a defendant remanded to custody.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “phrased in the affirmative, it implies a negative.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.