Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 78 Ohio App. 3d 138 - State v. Gullett

78 Ohio App. 3d 138 - State v. Gullett’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

76
cited by 76 later decisions
4
states following
April 2022
most recently cited

76 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 76 later decisions — most recently April 2022 · most notably State v. Shindler (1994), 126 Ohio App. 3d 95 - State v. Lloyd (1998)

76 state decisions

3001992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Delaware v. Prouse · State v. Bobo · City of Xenia v. Wallace · 21 Ohio App. 3d 140 - City of Akron v. Milewski

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'(A) A vehicle or trackless trolley shall be driven, as nearly as is practicable, entirely within a single lane or line of traffic and shall not be moved from such lane or line until the driver has first ascertained that such movement can be made with safety.’ ””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “two or more clearly marked lanes for traffic”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““The touchstone of the Fourth Amendment is reasonableness. Where a vehicle is driven on a roadway with no other traffic present, there was no speeding, erratic driving or other conduct, except for the edge line incident, to indicate that appellee was impaired, the balance is in favor of the right to privacy and against the need for a stop. Based upon the totality of the circumstances, we are not persuaded that sufficient articulable facts, and inferences therefrom, existed to constitutionally justify the stop.” (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.