78 Ohio App. 3d 206 - State v. Banks’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
49 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably State v. Hunter (2011), 103 Ohio App. 3d 368 - State v. Garrow (1995)
49 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · State v. Jenks · 20 Ohio App. 3d 172 - State v. Martin · State v. Dehass
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“determining whether a criminal conviction is against the manifest weight of the evidence,* * *must review the entire record, weigh the evidence and all reasonable inferences, consider the credibility of the witnesses, and determine whether, in resolving conflicts in the evidence, the trier of fact clearly lost its way and created such a manifest miscarriage of justice that the conviction must be reversed and a new trial granted.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Even when sufficient evidence supports a verdict, we may conclude that the verdict is against the manifest weight of the evidence, because the test under the manifest weight standard is much broader than that for sufficiency of the evidence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]his review is tempered by the principle that questions of weight and credibility are primarily for the trier of fact. * * * Thus, the power to reverse a judgment as against the manifest weight must be exercised with caution and only in the rare case where the evidence weighs heavily against conviction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.