Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 78 Ohio App. 3d 42 - State v. McColloch

78 Ohio App. 3d 42 - State v. McColloch’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
July 2022
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently July 2022 · most notably 80 Ohio App. 3d 452 - State v. Thomas (1992), 175 Ohio App. 3d 613 - State v. Watt (2008)

27 state decisions

2201991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Benton v. Maryland · United States v. DiFrancesco · Ex parte Lange · Bozza v. United States · United States v. Benz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an invalid sentence for which there is no statutory authority is * * * a circumstance under which there can be no expectation of finality”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Here, the trial court was statutorily required to impose a period of post-release control. The original sentencing entry did not include the imposition of post-release control and therefore was void. Because jeopardy did not attach to the void sentence, the trial court did not violate defendant's constitutional guarantee against double jeopardy in later correcting the sentence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “By placing a defendant on probation, the judge has afforded the benefit of a reduced sentence conditioned upon the defendant's efforts to reform. A defendant has no expectation of finality in the original sentence when it is subject to his compliance with the terms of his probation. In the event of a violation of probation, the original sentence does not become final but is subject to modification within the standards of state law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.