78 Ohio App. 3d 731 - Fenton v. Query’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

17 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““A claim may be held plainly insubstantial under the test only if it is obviously without merit or if its unsoundness so clearly results from previous judicial decisions that it must be said that the subject is foreclosed and that there is no room for the inference that the question sought to be raised can be a matter of legitimate controversy. [Citations omitted.]” Id., 21 Ohio App.3d at 273 , 21 OBR at 344, 487 N.E.2d at 917 .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 79 Ohio App. 3d 86 - City of Cincinnati Ex Rel. Kuntz v. City of Cincinnati

2. “and (2) the claim upon which the plaintiff has prevailed either (a) was based on a federal right created under a statute specified in Section 1988 or (b) was based on state law, but was joined in an action and arose out of”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Krol v. Council of City of Seven Hills, 90596 (10-2-2008)

3. “with such a federal claim that, although unaddressed, satisfied a test for substantiality. Fenton at 737 . {¶ 17} The Krols cannot be considered to be a prevailing party, because the appellants are considered to have”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Krol v. Council of City of Seven Hills, 90596 (10-2-2008)