Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 78 Okla. 105 - Foreman v. Needles

Foreman v. Needles’s Empirical Analysis

1920

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
2
states following
May 1955
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently May 1955 · most notably Lowe v. Hickory (1935), Knebel v. Rennie (1922)

1 federal appellate · 32 state decisions

1701920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cockle v. Flack · Dozier v. Mitchell · Garland v. Union Trust Co. · German Savings, Building & Loan Ass'n v. Leavens · Matthews v. . Coe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In determining whether or not a given contract for the payment of money is usurious, it is clearly the rule that where the contract is susceptible of two constructions, the one lawful and the other unlawful, the former will be adopted. * * * This is on the theory that presumptions of law are in favor of good faith. Men are presumed to intend to keep within the law, and if their contracts can be enforced within the law, the law will presume such was the intent,, and so consider it.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““ . . . the mere fact that the lender accepts a gift from the borrower, while a suspicious circumstance, will not render the loan usurious, if such gift be really voluntary.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.