Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 78 Okla. 12 - Scott v. Ryal

Scott v. Ryal’s Empirical Analysis

1920

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
September 1942
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently September 1942

2 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

50192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Campbell v. Wadsworth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In our judgment, to concede this substantial right to the defendant would be subversive of the well-known purpose of Congress in passing section 6 of the Supplemental Agreement, protecting the right of citizens of the Creek Nation to inherit the lands thereof, to the exclusion of noncitizen heirs.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.