Stuart v. Coleman’s Empirical Analysis
1920
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently March 1998
5 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Cohens v. Virginia · Cohens v. Virginia · Bradford v. Southern Railway Co. · Levindale Lead Zinc Mining Company v. Charles Coleman · James Nations and Joseph Nations v. Nancy Ann Johnson and James Johnson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘Where the law gives a right of" review to an appellate court, all persons are necessarily charged with notice thereof, and lis pendens is adequate to give a litigant protection until he can pursue all the remedies to which he is entitled in the action, and therefore, although a judgment of final decree has been entered, the cause is deemed to be pending while the right to prosecute it further by appeal remains.’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Coppedge v. Clinton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.