78 Or. App. 520 - Page v. Cupp’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 2019
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"it is absolutely impossible that there be any finality to this type of litigation. In each successive post-conviction proceeding all a petitioner need do is allege that his attorneys in each of his previous proceedings were unfaithful to their trust, and the door is opened wide to relitigate ad infinitum." Id.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“presumes that the petitioner has knowledge of all grounds for relief that were, or should have been, discovered before the close of the original proceeding”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gutale v. State“could not reasonably have been raised in the earlier [post-conviction] proceeding, because his counsel in that proceeding was ineffective.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gutale v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.