Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 78 S.D. 367 - Brown v. Murdy

Brown v. Murdy’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
March 2010
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently March 2010

8 state decisions

40196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rowan v. Becker · Applegate v. Riggall · Oklahoma Railway Co. v. Ivery · Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Hardee · Miller's Adm'x v. Picard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “For the purposes of this Act the term `joint tortfeasors' means two or more persons jointly or severally liable in tort for the same injury to person or property, whether or not judgment has been recovered against all or some of them.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.