Erickson v. Gill’s Empirical Analysis
1959
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 74 Cal. App. 2d 312 - Peterson v. Peterson · Butler v. Parrocha · Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Elder W. Marshall, Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Elder W. Marshall and Bessie I. Marshall · Langford v. Issenhuth · Morrell Livestock Co. v. Stockman's Commission Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A debtor may pay one creditor in preference to another, or may give to one creditor security for the payment of his demand in preference to another.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hove v. Frazier
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.