Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 78 S.D. 647 - Brown v. Warner

Brown v. Warner’s Empirical Analysis

1961

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
4
states following
August 2001
most recently cited

50 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently August 2001 · most notably State v. Addington (1979), Cromwell v. Hosbrook (1965)

50 state decisions

18019611970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Scott v. Liechti · Kelly v. Gram · Medin v. Brookfield · Lenker v. Musilek · Ansted v. Grieve

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “somewhere between the rule in ordinary civil cases and the requirement of our criminal procedure, that is, it must be more than a mere preponderance but not beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Whether the evidence in a given case is clear and convincing is a question in the first instance to be determined by the trial court. Because of his participation in the proceedings he is in a better position than are we to evaluate its persuasiveness. It is not our function to substitute our judgment for his but rather to determine whether his findings are based on evidence which we can say meets the minimum standards of being clear and convincing, bearing in mind that it is for him to determine the credibility of the witnesses and the weight and value to be given their testimony. When he determines that the evidence is sufficient to warrant the imposition of a trust we may not disturb his conclusion unless we can say after an examination of the entire record and all the circumstances surrounding the transaction that the clear preponderance of the evidence is against his determination. * * * Brown v. Warner, 78 S.D. 647 , 107 N.W. 2d 1, at 5 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.