78 So. 3d 696 - Crick v. Crick’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 12 So. 3d 314 - Austin v. Austin · 962 So. 2d 1048 - Hotaling v. Hotaling · 679 So. 2d 837 - Stoler v. Stoler · 877 So. 2d 882 - Vega v. Vega · 51 So. 3d 596 - Tilchin v. Tilchin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“although the report and -7- recommendation contained findings as to the factors listed in section 61.08(2)(a)-(g), it did not contain the requisite findings as to the need of the former wife or the former husband's ability to pay”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.