Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

78 S.W.2d 164

Maul v. Williams

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided January 30, 1935

Texas Commission of Appeals · decided 1935-01-30

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1935-01-30

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently March 2004

1 federal appellate · 23 state decisions

7019351940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

CRITZ, Commissioner.

¶1This case was appealed from the district court of Bexar county, Tex., by C. F. Maul. Margaret Williams et al. were appellees in the Court of Civil Appeals. They are -defendants in error here. The Court of Civil Appeals dismissed ’this case and did not pass on its merits. Maul prosecuted writ of error to this court. The writ was granted and on final hearing in this court the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals was reversed and the cause remanded to that court. Under such a record 'the costs in this case should have been adjudged against the defendants in error. The adjudication of all other costs should have been left to the Court of Civil Appeals.

¶2The motion to retax costs filed herein by O. F. Maul is granted, and the costs retaxqd as above indicated.

¶3Opinion adopted by the Supreme Court.

/78/sw2d/164 · .json · Public domain