Winston v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 268th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Kelly v. State · State v. Roscoe · Nenno v. State · Robinette v. Barnes · State v. Terrazas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If scientific, technical or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact. to understand the evidence or, to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Smith“there is little distinction between a scent lineup and a situation where a dog is required to track an individual's scent over an area traversed by multiple persons.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Winfrey v. State“olfactory sense of the American bloodhound is legendary.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.