Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 78 SW3D 522 - Winston v. State

Winston v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
4
states following
March 2013
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 268th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Kelly v. State · State v. Roscoe · Nenno v. State · Robinette v. Barnes · State v. Terrazas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If scientific, technical or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact. to understand the evidence or, to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “there is little distinction between a scent lineup and a situation where a dog is required to track an individual's scent over an area traversed by multiple persons.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “olfactory sense of the American bloodhound is legendary.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.