Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 78 Utah 350 - State v. Stenback

State v. Stenback’s Empirical Analysis

1931

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
3
states following
June 2022
most recently cited

1 district · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently June 2022

1 district · 17 state decisions

901931194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. Price · State v. Anselmo · State v. Dewey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The term ‘wilfully’ when applied to the intent with which an act is done, or omitted, implies simply a purpose or willingness to commit the act or make the omission referred to. It does not require any intent to violate law or to injure another or to acquire any advantage.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.