McGlen v. Barrett’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc. · CaterCorp, Inc. v. Catering Concepts, Inc. · Sensenbrenner v. Rust, Orling & Neale, Architects, Inc. · Winn v. Aleda Const. Co., Inc. · Kamlar Corp. v. Haley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Virginia is a plain meaning jurisdiction. A principal rule of statutory interpretation is that courts will give statutory language its plain meaning. See Jackson v. Fidelity & Deposit Co., 269 Va. 303, 313, 608 S.E.2d 901 (2005). The plain text of Va. Code § 55-524(C) only provides for two scenarios: (1) when a disclosure or disclaimer is provided; and (2) when a disclosure or disclaimer is not provided. In the instant case Defendants provided Plaintiff with a disclaimer. Therefore, the Plaintiff filed outside the applicable one year statute of limitations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. McGlen v. Rosenfeld
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.