Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 78 Wash. 2d 922 - State v. Maloney

78 Wash. 2d 922 - State v. Maloney’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
June 2007
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 2007

14 state decisions

901971198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Singer v. United States · People v. Roberts · 1 Cal. 3d 335 - People v. Fowler · 71 Wash. 2d 312 - State v. Garrison · 77 Wash. 2d 33 - State v. Ashby

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In State v. Harlowe, 174 Wash. 227 , 24 P.2d 601 (1933), we considered RCW 9.87.010(7), recognized the common and ordinary meaning of the terms employed and held that the provision was not vague and uncertain. Since that time, we have further considered 'and somewhat limited or narrowed the meaning of the word “disorderly” as used in the context of the provision. In these later decisions we have held that the word, in its context, connotes overt misconduct contrary to the rules of good order and behavior, which is violative of the public peace. Seattle v. Franklin, 191 Wash. 297 , 70 P.2d 1049 (1937); State v. Finrow, 66 Wn.2d 818 , 405 P.2d 600 (1965); State v. Levin, 67 Wn.2d. 988, 410 P.2d 901 (1966). As so construed and applied we can perceive no fatal vagueness.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “invests the trial court with discretion in ruling upon a defendant’s request for a nonjury trial, and that an appellate court will not disturb a trial court’s refusal of such a request absent a showing that the trial court manifestly abused its discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Cases required to be tried by jury shall be so tried unless the defendant files a written waiver of a jury trial, and has consent of the court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.