Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 78 Wash. App. 115 - Kuhlman v. Thomas

78 Wash. App. 115 - Kuhlman v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

53 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently July 2018 · most notably 100 Wash. App. 885 - DeYoung v. Cenex Ltd. (2000), Pederson v. Potter (2000)

53 state decisions

360199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois Foundation · 98 Wash. 2d 434 - Wilson v. Steinbach · Credithrift of America, Inc. v. United States · Apex Oil Co. v. Clark Oil & Refining Corp. · Costantini v. Trans World Airlines

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) [W]hether rights or interests established in the prior judgment would be destroyed or impaired by prosecution of the second action; (2) whether substantially the same evidence is presented in the two actions; (3) whether the two suits involve infringement of the same right; and (4) whether the two suits arise out of the same transactional nucleus of facts.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`from litigating claims that either were, or should have been, litigated in a former action.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “there is no specific test for determining identity of causes of action”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.