78 Wash. App. 758 - State v. Ryan’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently July 2012
21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 125 Wash. 2d 146 - State v. Krall · 119 Wash. 2d 563 - State v. Zakel · 50 Wash. App. 401 - State v. Tindal · 50 Wash. App. 248 - State v. Raleigh · 53 Wash. App. 491 - State v. Pockert
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) If restitution is ordered, the court shall determine the amount of restitution due at the sentencing hearing or within ((sixty)) one hundred eighty days. The court may continue the hearing beyond the one hundred eighty days for good cause.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“A defendant objecting to the total amount shown must file a motion for a restitution hearing with the Court Clerk, and serve a copy on the Prosecuting Attorney. Defendant must contact the Judge or the Judge's bailiff to schedule a hearing on the motion.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[A]n ex parte restitution order is final and enforceable only if the defendant does not object....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Moen · State v. Burmaster
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.