78 Wis. 2d 516 - State v. Pohlhammer’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
39 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably State v. Kelty (2006), 90 Wis. 2d 528 - State Ex Rel. Skinkis v. Treffert (1979)
39 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Difronzo v. United States · 43 Wis. 2d 661 - Ernst v. State · 26 Wis. 2d 646 - State v. Lampe · State v. Civella
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The plea should not have been accepted. Neither should the amended information have been allowed. Invalidating the plea invalidates the plea bargain. Since the amended information was conditioned upon defendant's agreement to plead guilty, and the information was accepted in lieu of the prior information, this case is returned to the trial court in the same posture it occupied prior to the [plea] hearing.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The jurisdictional question involved is one of personal jurisdiction, that is, power to proceed to judgment against a particular defendant, rather than power to proceed against any defendant.” Id. (Emphasis added.) Pohlhammer suggests that the statute of limitations defense may be waived; however, this must be an express waiver. Id. at 524 . Pohlhammer also states that a plea of not guilty”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“when a warrant or summons is issued, an indictment is found, or an information is filed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Dabney
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.