Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 780 A2D 1024 - Virdin v. State

Virdin v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
states following
July 2014
most recently cited

22 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Moran v. Burbine · Sedillo v. United States · United States v. Jacobsen · Walter v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.