Granberry v. Mizell’s Empirical Analysis
780 F.2d 14 · 1985
Citation profile
16 federal appellate ·
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Rose v. Lundy · Rogers v. United States · Hudson v. Palmer · Chemical Manufacturers Ass'n v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · McGee v. Wj Estelle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“without prejudice to proceeding in any appropriate circuit court for consideration of the question presented.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Granberry v. Greer · Crump v. Lane“as suggesting that the exhaustion requirement may be waived by the failure to assert it in the district court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Crump v. Lane
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.