In Re Ira Laurence Hunter, Debtor. Edwin Schweig v. Ira Laurence Hunter’s Empirical Analysis
780 F.2d 1577 · 1986
Citation profile
28 federal appellate · 6 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 379 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2018 · most notably Grogan v. Garner (1991), In the Matter of Michael VAN HORNE. Margaret CASPERS, Appellee, v. Michael VAN HORNE, Appellant (1987)
28 federal appellate · 6 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 523
Relies on Gleason v. Thaw · Neal v. Clark · Household Finance Corp. v. Danns · Runnion v. Pedrazzini
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 379 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“false pretenses, a false representation, or actual fraud, other than a statement respecting the debtor’s or an insider’s financial condition.”
50 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) the debtor made a false representation with the purpose and intention of deceiving the creditor; (2) the creditor relied on such representation; (3) the reliance was reasonably founded; and (4) the creditor sustained a loss as a result of the representation.”
45 later decisions quote this exact passage““Because of the very nature and philosophy of the Bankruptcy law the exceptions to dischargeability are to be construed strictly, Gleason v. Thaw, 236 U.S. 558 , 35 S.Ct. 287 , 59 L.Ed. 717 (1915).” In re Hunter, 780 F.2d 1577, 1579 (11th Cir.1986).”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.