Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 780 F.2d 336 - Benoit v. Panthaky

Benoit v. Panthaky’s Empirical Analysis

780 F.2d 336 · 1985

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
2
states following
August 2007
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 4 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently August 2007

5 federal appellate · 4 district · 4 state decisions

110198519902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Harris v. McRae · Mennonite Board of Missions v. Adams · Burnett v. New York Central Railroad · Costello v. United States · The Key City

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The elements of the defense of laches are '(1) lack of diligence by the party against whom the defense is asserted, and (2) prejudice to the party asserting the defense.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.