Ray v. Karris’s Empirical Analysis
780 F.2d 636 · 1985
Citation profile
20 federal appellate · 5 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 77 later decisions — most recently December 2012 · most notably Rose 88-1634 v. Bartle a Reed W 88-1646 (1989), Craftmatic Securities Litigation v. Kraftsow (1989)
20 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 778 · 15 U.S.C. § 77A (§ 1 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 78A (§ 1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1343 · 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1964 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act)
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Sedima Sprl v. Imrex Company Inc · Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug Stores · Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. Green · Superintendent of Insurance of State of New York v. Bankers Life and Casualty Company
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 77 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“specify the nature of the predicate acts to a degree that will allow the defendants to comprehend the specific acts to which they are required to answer.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[Diminution in value] has been held to be outside of the scope of the 'forced seller' concept.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(c) It shall be unlawful for any person employed by or associated with any enterprise engaged in ... interstate ... commerce, to conduct or participate, directly or indirectly, in the conduct of such enterprise’s affairs through a pattern of racketeering activity or collection of unlawful debt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.