Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 780 F.2d 786 - Irving H. Levin and Harold A. Lipton v. Philip H. Knight

Irving H. Levin and Harold A. Lipton v. Philip H. Knight’s Empirical Analysis

780 F.2d 786 · 1986

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
March 2007
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently March 2007

16 federal appellate · 1 district ·

120198619902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Landreth Timber Co. v. Landreth · 36 Cal. 3d 752 - Seaman's Direct Buying Service, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co. · Blau v. Del Monte Corporation · 4 Cal. 3d 11 - Tahoe National Bank v. Phillips · Monarco v. Lo Greco

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The district court’s grant of summary judgment will be affirmed if, viewing the evidence and the inferences therefrom in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion, there are no genuine issues of material fact in dispute and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. R.F.D. Publications, Inc. v. Oregonian Publishing Co., 749 F.2d 1327 , 1328 (9th Cir.1984).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The judgment sought shall be rendered forthwith if the pleadings, depositions answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Tenzer ... now permits an action for fraudulent misrepresentation upon an alleged oral agreement or upon an agreement otherwise unenforceable under the statute of frauds.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.