Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 780 F.2d 897 - Amcor, Inc. v. Brock

Amcor, Inc. v. Brock’s Empirical Analysis

780 F.2d 897 · 1986

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
December 2015
most recently cited

6 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently December 2015

6 federal appellate ·

501986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956) · 41 U.S.C. § 351 (Service Contract) · 41 U.S.C. § 354

Relies on Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co. · Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc. · Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co. · American Farm Lines v. Black Ball Freight Service · Palmer v. Connecticut Railway & Lighting Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The threshold issue is whether the administrator was foreclosed from reviewing the ALJ’s findings because the solicitor had failed to file timely objections. The regulations required the solicitor to file exceptions by February 15, 1979. We conclude that we need not decide the meaning of the word “filed” in the regulations since the administrator was entitled to waive the filing deadline in the interest of justice. An administrative agency may waive procedural requirements in the interest of justice, provided such a waiver will not prejudice the other party, (citing cases), (emphasis supplied, except that the word “procedural” was italicized by the Court.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.