Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 780 F.2d 975 - United States v. Jimenez

United States v. Jimenez’s Empirical Analysis

780 F.2d 975 · 1986

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
6
states following
December 2024
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently December 2024 · most notably United States v. Friedman (1988), United States v. Diaz (2001)

17 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

13019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Bruton v. United States · United States v. Blasco · United States v. Four Million, Two Hundred Fifty-Five Thousand · Miller v. Universal City Studios, Inc. · United States v. Garrett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[S]triking the testimony is a serious sanction and should be used only where a party has suffered actual prejudice and there has been connivance by the witness or counsel to violate the rule.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[p]robable cause exists where the facts and totality of the circumstances ... are 'sufficient to cause a person of reasonabl[e] caution to believe an offense has been ... committed.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The district court's denial of a mistrial for violation of the sequestration rule is . . . a matter of discretion and reversible only on a showing of prejudice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.