Daire v. Lattimore’s Empirical Analysis
780 F.3d 1215 · 2015
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Harrington v. Richter · Rompilla v. Beard · McNeill v. United States · Harrington v. Richter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The court cannot ignore that while Ms. Daire has continued in her criminal conduct she has been mostly motivated by her poverty, homelessness, and drug use. She has chosen homes where largely the residents have not been present.... Only once has her non-violent conduct turned potentially violent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Daire v. Lattimore“up for two days.” Id. When the prosecution asked how she had • managed to”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Daire v. Lattimore
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.