Olmos v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
780 F.3d 1313 · 2015
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3142 (Bail Reform Act of 1984) · 8 U.S.C. § 1153 (§ 203 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1226 (§ 236 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Edward J. DeBartolo Corp. v. Florida Gulf Coast Building & Construction Trades Council · Clark Field Office Director Seattle Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al. v. Martinez · Demore District Director San Francisco District of Immigration and Naturalization Service et al. v. Kim · Brock v. Pierce County
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he canon of constitutional avoidance does not bear on our inquiry at [ Chevron ] step one.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Arangure v. Whitaker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.