Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 780 F.3d 14 - In re Tsarnaev

In re Tsarnaev’s Empirical Analysis

780 F.3d 14 · 2015

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
March 2024
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1404

Relies on Miller-El v. Cockrell Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division · Irvin v. Dowd · Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal. · Sheppard v. Maxwell · Estes v. Texas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the court must transfer the proceeding against the defendant to another district court if the court is satisfied that so great a prejudice against the defendant exists in the transferring district that the defendant cannot obtain a fair and impartial trial there.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “In those rare, extreme circumstances it may be a 'denial of due process of law to refuse the request for a change of venue.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[b]y constitutional design, [ ] trial occurs 'in the State where the ... crimes ... have been committed,'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.