Campbell v. Reardon’s Empirical Analysis
780 F.3d 752 · 2015
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Wiggins v. Smith, Warden · Harrington v. Richter · McNeill v. United States · Harrington v. Richter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“needed to develop the record on (1) the extent of counsel's actu- al pretrial investigation and (2) what these witnesses would have said if called to testify at trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. People v. Veach“more likely than not altered the outcome.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. People v. Veach
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.