Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 780 F.3d 799 - Reeder v. Madigan

Reeder v. Madigan’s Empirical Analysis

780 F.3d 799 · 2015

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
June 2023
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Ex Parte: Edward T Young · Powell v. McCormack · Tenney v. Brandhove · Supreme Court of Virginia v. Consumers Union of the United States, Inc. · Gravel v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A contrary rule would make it nearly impossible for a legislature to function, as it would potentially subject legislators and their aides to liability for every floor-access decision they make.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “it can easily be inferred ... that the legislature believes that the presence of lobbyists risks an impairment of deliberations.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[i]t is hardly a stretch to characterize control of access to the legislative floor as a core legislative function.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.