Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 780 F.3d 998 - Quinn v. Young

Quinn v. Young’s Empirical Analysis

780 F.3d 998 · 2015

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
February 2025
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 7 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently February 2025 · most notably Cox v. Glanz (2015), A.M. ex rel. F.M. v. Holmes (2016)

12 federal appellate · 7 district ·

36020152020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Anderson v. Creighton · Pearson v. Callahan · Scott v. Harris · Hope v. Pelzer · Wilson v. Layne

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “but existing precedent must have placed the ... constitutional question beyond debate,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “identif[ies] an on-point Supreme Court or published Tenth Circuit decision,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Although it is not necessary for the facts in the cited authority to correspond exactly to the situation the plaintiff complains of, the 'plaintiff must demonstrate a substantial correspondence between the conduct in question and prior law allegedly establishing that the defendant's actions were clearly prohibited.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.