Golightly v. Yeutter’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 5 U.S.C. § 706 · 7 U.S.C. § 1308 · 7 U.S.C. § 1385 · 7 U.S.C. § 1421 (Agricultural Act of 1949) · 7 U.S.C. § 1441 · 7 U.S.C. § 1444 · 7 U.S.C. § 1444
Relies on Udall v. Tallman · United States v. Alpine Land & Reservoir Co. · Washington Crab Producers, Inc. v. Mosbacher · Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe of Indians v. Hodel · National Medical Enterprises, Inc. v. Sullivan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is circumscribed by the requirement that some reasonable basis be shown” for discrimination between similarly situated parties). 11 .The defendants in Esch had argued that 7 U.S.C. § 1385 precluded judicial review because it provided that the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“or the amount thereof, when officially determined in conformity with the applicable regulations”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.