McCormick v. McCormick’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
December 2012
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 178 Ind. App. 336 - Farthing v. Farthing · Wilhelm v. Wilhelm · In re the Marriage of Dillman · Boruff v. Boruff · Lowes v. Lowes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to realistically appraise a spouse's employment opportunities, keeping in mind both the type and degree of spouse's incapacity and the spouse's present skills and experience.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“to be physically or mentally incapacitated to the extent that the ability of the incapacitated spouse to support himself or herself is materially affected[.]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The essential inquiry is whether the incapacitated spouse has the ability to support himself or herself.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Matzat v. Matzat
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.